Asian Journal of atmospheric environment
Asian Journal of atmospheric environment Asian Journal of atmospheric environment
Asian Journal of atmospheric environment
  Aims and Scope Type of Manuscripts Best Practices Contact Information  
  Editor-in-Chief Associate Editors Editorial Advisory Board  

Journal Archive

Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment - Vol. 12 , No. 2

[ Research Article ]
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment - Vol. 12, No. 2
Abbreviation: Asian J. Atmos. Environ
ISSN: 1976-6912 (Print) 2287-1160 (Online)
Print publication date 30 Jun 2018
Received 14 Nov 2017 Revised 29 Jan 2018 Accepted 07 Feb 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2018.12.2.127

The Relative Importance of Indoor and Outdoor Sources for Determining Indoor Pollution Concentrations in Homes in Seoul, South Korea
Jae Young Lee ; Kyunghwan Kim1) ; Sung Hee Ryu2) ; Chang Hyeok Kim1) ; Gwi-Nam Bae1), *
Institute of Health and Environment and Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 1, Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
1)Center for Environment, Health and Welfare Research, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), 5 Hwarang-ro 14-gil, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
2)Research Management Team, R&D Center for Green Patrol Technologies, 120, Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to : *Tel: +82-2-958-5676, E-mail: gnbae@kist.re.kr

Funding Information ▼

Abstract

This study measured indoor and outdoor levels of hydrocarbon volatile organic compounds (VOCs), such as benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene isomers (collectively referred to as BTEX), as well as 13 carbonyl compounds, at 20 homes in Seoul, South Korea. Along with the sampling of BTEX and carbonyls, indoor concentrations of the air pollutants nitrogen oxide (NO) and carbon dioxide (CO2) were also measured at each home. These measurements were used to understand the characteristics of BTEX and carbonyls by calculating the various ratios and correlation coefficients between measured contaminant levels. We found that carbonyls were mostly originated from indoor sources, while BTEX were originated from both indoor and outdoor sources. A high correlation between indoor levels of NO and BTEX indicated that traffic emissions were also an important sources of BTEX.


Keywords: Volatile organic compound, Aromatic hydrocarbon, Carbonyl compound, Indoor air pollutant, BTEX, Indoor-to-outdoor ratio, Positive matrix factorization

1. INTRODUCTION

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and carbonyl compounds emitted into the atmosphere have been studied due to their adverse impacts on human health. Previous studies have found that concentrations of these organic chemicals are higher indoors than outdoors (Bruno et al., 2008; Jia et al., 2008; Parra et al., 2008; Báez et al., 2003; Guo et al., 2003). Human exposure to VOCs and carbonyls via inhalation is directly related to indoor concentrations because people spend more time in indoor environments. Studies have therefore focused on indoor emissions and transport of VOCs and carbonyl compounds to understand the effects of these compounds on human health.

Among VOCs, aromatic hydrocarbons, such as benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (collectively referred to as BTEX), mainly emitted from petroleum and natural gas combustion, are well-known for their carcinogenicity and abundance in indoor environments (Kume et al., 2008; Skov et al., 2001). Previous studies have investigated the correlations between indoor BTEX levels and various factors. Schlink et al. (2010) found that indoor VOC concentrations were strongly correlated with seasonality and residence type. They also reported high levels of benzene, toluene, and xylene isomers in apartments adjacent to highly trafficked roadways. Buczynska et al. (2009) determined that traffic jams due to merging lanes increased BTEX concentrations in Antwerp, Belgium. Guo et al. (2003) reported that indoor BTEX concentrations in several microenvironments were related to automobile exhaust, cooking style, type of gas stove, and cigarette smoking. In a study by Ilgen et al. (2001), traffic density was a key factor in determining indoor BTEX concentrations in urban areas, while indoor sources of BTEX were important in rural areas.

Carbonyl compounds emitted from automobile exhausts, building and furnishing materials, cigarette smoking, and consumer products have also been studied, as they can cause discomfort and irritation to human organs (Liu et al., 2013; Marchand et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 1994). Among carbonyls, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde have been classified as toxic and carcinogenic compounds by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC, 2004) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, 1989). Due to the adverse health effects of these chemicals, previous studies have mainly focused on indoor and outdoor concentrations and the factors affecting these levels. Sakai et al. (2004) found a link between the airtight designs of newer dwellings and higher formaldehyde concentrations. Báez et al. (2003) showed that levels of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were related to the presence of smokers, and Liu et al. (2013) found that urban areas in the U.S.A. had the highest levels of indoor sources. According to Kim et al. (2013), relative humidity is also associated with indoor concentrations of formaldehyde, and furniture and the age of the interior are major factors in formaldehyde levels in libraries and private reading rooms.

Although there are many previous studies, which investigated the characteristics of BTEX and carbonyls worldwide, no previous studies to our knowledge were conducted in South Korea. This study investigated the characteristics of BTEX and carbonyls at 20 homes in Seoul, South Korea, to understand the properties and the relative importance of indoor and outdoor sources of these compounds. In order to understand the origin of these pollutants, we calculated various ratios and correlation coefficients between measured concentration levels, such as indoor to outdoor ratios of BTEX and carbonyls.


2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2. 1 Sampling Sites and Methods
2. 1. 1 BTEX and Carbonyl Compounds

Samples were taken at 20 homes near heavily trafficked roads in Seoul, South Korea, on workdays from November 2013 to December 2014. The geographical information of measurement sites were shown in Fig. S1 in the supplementary material. Indoor and outdoor air samples were collected simultaneously from both the middle of the living room and the balcony for high-rise apartments. For low-story buildings, outdoor VOC and carbonyl measurements were taken in the front yard of the house. Indoor and outdoor sampling was conducted at each home an average of four times over 48 hours (totaling eight samples for each VOC and carbonyl, including both indoor and outdoor measurements). We chose 48 hours as the measurement period, because it was long enough to measure the concentrations several times but not too long to keep people from volunteering for the study. All VOC and carbonyl measurements were undertaken during the day. Table 1 shows the general features of the homes and residents.

Table 1. 
General description of sampled homes and their residents.
Home Time of the year Home type Home age (yr) Floor number Home size (m2) Stove type Number of occupants Number of smokers
Home 1 2013.09.30-10.02 High-rise 13 19 85 Gas 4 0
Home 2 2013.11.19-11.21 Low-rise 20 1 90 Gas 4 0
Home 3 2013.12.03-12.05 High-rise 4 25 84 Gas 4 0
Home 4* 2014.01.06-01.07 High-rise 7 18 109 Gas 3 0
Home 5 2014.01.21-01.23 High-rise 13 19 85 Gas 4 0
Home 6 2014.02.04-02.06 High-rise 13 4 185 Gas 4 0
Home 7 2014.02.18-02.20 High-rise 4 25 80 Gas 4 0
Home 8 2014.02.24-02.26 High-rise 15 2 80 Gas 2 0
Home 9 2014.03.11-03.13 High-rise 21 5 75 Gas 4 1
Home 10 2014.03.17-03.19 High-rise 26 8 117 Gas 4 0
Home 11 2014.04.01-04.03 High-rise 26 15 85 Gas 4 0
Home 12 2014.05.13-05.17 High-rise 17 1 50 Electric 3 0
Home 13 2014.07.14-07.16 High-rise 17 6 50 Gas 3 0
Home 14 2014.07.29-07.31 Low-rise 20 2 50 Gas 3 0
Home 15 2014.08.06-08.08 Low-rise 20 3 100 Electric 4 0
Home 16 2014.08.11-08.13 High-rise 2 14 85 Electric 4 0
Home 17 2014.09.17-09.19 High-rise 38 9 87 Gas 3 0
Home 18 2014.11.04-11.06 High-rise 7 24 108 Gas 4 0
Home 19 2014.11.18-11.20 High-rise 23 2 86 Gas 3 0
Home 20 2014.12.02-12.04 High-rise 15 25 51 Gas 4 0
*Measurements were performed for only 24 hours at the request of the residents.
†Carbonyl concentration measurements were eliminated due to sampling error.


Fig. S1. 
Geographical information of measurement sites.

VOCs were collected in Tenax TA adsorbent tubes (APK-1200, KnR, Korea) for 30 minutes using a personal pump (GilAir Plus, Gilian, USA) at a flow rate of 125 to 135 mL/min during the day. Prior to each sampling, every Tenax TA tube was cleaned with an ultrapure nitrogen gas flow of 50 mL/min at a temperature of 300°C for three hours, to remove any contamination. After sampling, the sealed Tenax TA tubes were immediately stored in a refrigerator at less than 4°C until analysis.

For carbonyl compounds, DNPH-Silica cartridges (LpDNPH S10, Supelco Inc., USA) equipped with ozone scrubbers (LpDNPH, Supelco Inc., USA) were used. Carbonyls were collected into cartridges with a personal pump (GilAir Plus, Gilian, USA) at a flow rate of 500 mL/min for 30 minutes. The ozone scrubber was connected to the upstream end of the cartridge, and the personal pump was connected to the downstream end. After sampling, the cartridges were tightly sealed, wrapped with aluminum foil, and stored in a refrigerator until analysis.

Residents were also questioned about five possible indoor sources of BTEX and carbonyl emissions: interior renovations within the last two years, the purchase of new furniture and/or consumer products, cigarette smoking, frequency of dry cleaning, and printer usage. During the measurement period, all occupants acted, and ventilated their house, as normal.

2. 1. 2 NO and CO2

To measure indoor NO concentrations in the homes, a Model 42i NO-NO2-NOx Analyzer (Thermo Scientific, USA) was used. For indoor CO2 measurements, a 1370 NDIR CO2 Analyzer (TES, Taiwan) was used. The instruments reported the real-time concentrations every 60 seconds. The NO and CO2 measurement systems were placed on an experimental tray, positioned between the living room and the kitchen, 1 m above the floor.

2. 2 Analytical Methods

Six VOC compounds, including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (m-, p-, and o-xylenes), were analyzed based on the ISO 16000-6 method. The samples were analyzed using an automated thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (ATD-GCMS) method. VOCs were desorbed from Tenax TA tubes with an ultra-pure nitrogen gas flow of 50 mL/min at 300°C for 10 minutes using a thermal desorber (TurboMatrix ATD 350, Perkin Elmer, USA). Subsequently, the VOC samples were analyzed using a Hewlett-Packard 6890 gas chromatograph equipped with a 5973 mass spectrometer (GC-MS, HP, Palo Alto, CA, USA). A ZB-1ms capillary, 60 m in length, 0.25 mm inner diameter (i.d.), and 1 μm thickness (ZB-1, Phenomenex, USA) was used for chromatographic separation. The oven temperature of the gas chromatograph was initially held at 40°C for four minutes, and then raised to 250°C at a rate of 6°C/min. Subsequently, it was raised at a rate of 10°C/min, and a final temperature of 300°C was reached and then held for 6 minutes. The total retention time in the gas chromatograph was therefore 50 minutes. TVOC concentrations were calculated based on the sum of C6-C16 concentrations and toluene calibration curve.

The 13 carbonyl compounds analyzed were formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein, acetone, propionaldehyde, crotonaldehyde, methacrolein, 2-butanone, butyraldehyde, benzaldehyde, valeraldehyde, m-tolualdehyde, and hexaldehyde. Since it was difficult to quantify the concentrations of acrolein and acetone separately due to their chromatographic co-elution, we quantified the sum of the two compounds. Compounds contained in cartridges were eluted with 5 mL of acetonitrile in high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade water (ACN, J.T. Baker, USA) using a 10-mL syringe connected to a cartridge adaptor. Subsequently, the extracts were analyzed using the HPLC method with an injection volume of 20 μL into the liquid chromatograph. A UV/diode-array detector (DAD) was used for this process, and the derivatives were detected at 360 nm. A YMC-Pack ODS-A column of 5 μm×25 cm× 4.6 mm was used, with a column oven temperature of 25°C. The volume ratio of water to acetonitrile was 60 : 40.

2. 3 Quality Assurance and Control

Field blanks were prepared to check the background levels of chemicals, and to detect any contamination during sample handling, storing, and analysis. The field blanks consisted of one or two tubes and cartridges for each home measurement. By using the mean and standard deviation of the concentration levels in the field blanks, the detection limits (mean+3σ) for all compounds were obtained (see Tables S1 and S2 in the supplementary material). The values of the field blanks were subtracted from those of the measurement samples.

Table S1. 
Mean and standard deviations (SD) of field blank samples and limit of detection (LOD) for BTEXS and TVOCs (n=13).
Compounds Mean (μg/m3) SD (σ) (μg/m3) LOD (mean+3σ) (μg/m3)
Benzene 2.5 0.6 4.2
Toluene 2.2 1.0 5.2
Ethylbenzene 0.6 0.2 1.1
m-Xylene 2.6 0.5 4.1
Styrene 2.2 0.5 3.7
o-Xylene 2.5 2.3 9.3
TVOC 6.2 3.9 17.9

Table S2. 
Mean and standard deviations (SD) of field blank samples and limit of detection (LOD) for carbonyls (n=21).
Compounds Mean (μg/m3) SD (σ) (μg/m3) LOD (mean+3σ) (μg/m3)
Formaldehyde 0.8 0.5 2.3
Acetaldehyde 0.5 0.3 1.5
Acrolein+Acetone 2.0 2.3 9.0
Propionaldehyde 0.8 0.0 0.8
Crotonaldehyde n.d. n.d. n.d.
Methacrolein n.d. n.d. n.d.
2-Butanone 1.0 0.8 3.5
Butyaldehyde n.d. n.d. n.d.
Benzaldehyde 0.2 0.0 0.2
Valeraldehyde n.d. n.d. n.d.
m-Tolualdehyde 0.2 0.0 0.2
Hexaaldehyde n.d. n.d. n.d.
Carbonyls 3.4 3.0 12.3
n.d. indicates “not detected”

BTEX compounds were calibrated using standard mixtures (Indoor Air Standard, 50 Component, Supelco Inc., USA) with the concentration range of the compounds from 0 to 200 ng/μL. A 5-point calibration curve was prepared to quantify the BTEX compounds in the samples. A certified calibration mix standard (Carb Method 1004 DNPH Mix 2, Supelco, USA) was also used for the 13 carbonyls, whose concentrations ranged from 0 to 300 ng/mL. In the carbonyl compound calibration, a 6-point calibration curve was prepared. For MS detection, quality control was performed on every 9th sample, using standard mixtures including hexane (100 ng/μL), toluene (50 ng/μL), decane (50 ng/μL), tetradecane (50 ng/μL), pentadecane (50 ng/μL), and hexadecane (50 ng/μL) in a volume of 2 μL. The percentages of recovery were all higher than 96%.

2. 4 Statistical Analysis

First, the I/O ratios and correlations between indoor and outdoor levels were calculated to establish the origin (indoor or outdoor) of indoor BTEX and carbonyl compounds. Next, the correlations between these compounds and indoor air pollutants were analyzed. The indoor air pollutants investigated were nitrogen oxide (NO), one of the oxides of nitrogen, and carbon dioxide (CO2), selected because CO2 concentration can be used as an indicator of ventilation and occupancy levels (Bentayeb et al., 2013; Jia et al., 2008), while NO concentration can indicate traffic volumes (Vardoulakis et al., 2002). Additionally, correlations of BTEX and carbonyl compounds with possible indoor sources, such as interior materials, new furniture, cigarette smoke, high frequency of dry cleaning, and printer usage, were investigated. The ratios of toluene-to-benzene and formaldehyde-to-acetaldehyde were also calculated for further assessment of the characteristics of the organic chemicals in this study. Lastly, positive matrix factorization (US EPA PMF version 5.0) was performed on the measured indoor and outdoor BTEX concentrations to enable apportionment of the sources.


3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3. 1 Indoor and outdoor Levels of BTEX and Carbonyls at Homes

Table 2 shows the descriptive statistics for the measured indoor and outdoor concentrations of BTEX for 20 homes, and of carbonyl compounds for 19 homes. The total number of samples was 73 for BTEX and total VOC (TVOC) concentrations, including from C6 to C16, and 78 for carbonyls (approximately four times per home). Of the indoor and outdoor BTEX samples, toluene had the highest concentrations, followed by xylenes, ethylbenzene, and benzene. The average indoor BTEX concentration was 1.46 times higher than the outdoor concentration, while the average indoor TVOC and carbonyl concentrations were both more than 3 times higher than the outdoor concentrations. In a study by Kim et al. (2013), which investigated indoor aldehyde concentrations in South Korea, they detected similar concentrations of formaldehyde (29.2 μg/m3) and acetaldehyde (8.9 μg/m3) in a public library, while much higher aldehyde concentrations were detected in a children’s library, and in public and private reading rooms. Note that the mean indoor and outdoor concentrations of benzene were below ambient air pollution guideline concentrations for South Korea (5 μg/m3) (MOE, 2016), but above Japan’s guideline (3 μg/m3) (MOE, 2016). The indoor and outdoor mean concentrations of formaldehyde were much lower than indoor air pollution guideline concentrations, which are 100 μg/m3 both for Korea (Kim et al., 2013) and the WHO (WHO, 2000).

Table 2. 
Descriptive statistics for the measured indoor and outdoor BTEX and carbonyl concentrations.
(in μg/m3) N Mean Std. dev. Median Max Min
Indoor Benzene 73 3.39 7.07 1.95 53.89 <LOD
Toluene 73 39.77 45.43 26.08 253.94 <LOD
Ethylbenzene 73 7.75 13.04 4.60 103.82 <LOD
Xylenes 73 10.17 12.61 6.46 54.21 <LOD
BTEX 73 61.08 65.02 36.55 370.08 <LOD
TVOC 73 989.20 3120.01 285.77 22954.38 3.43
Formaldehyde 78 27.68 16.32 24.26 81.10 0.20
Acetaldehyde 78 11.53 7.21 10.16 48.70 1.06
Carbonyls* 78 106.82 72.92 94.10 474.10 0.20
Outdoor Benzene 73 3.75 7.69 1.64 47.12 <LOD
Toluene 73 28.69 37.15 15.71 213.07 <LOD
Ethylbenzene 73 4.29 4.89 2.82 24.27 <LOD
Xylenes 73 5.76 7.32 3.22 34.89 <LOD
BTEX 73 42.49 50.55 28.45 276.19 0.89
TVOC 73 306.03 555.67 102.37 3532.60 1.39
Formaldehyde 78 7.31 6.98 4.87 38.10 <LOD
Acetaldehyde 78 4.83 4.88 3.68 26.95 <LOD
Carbonyls* 78 32.75 20.89 29.08 92.16 <LOD
*Carbonyls include formaldehyde and acetaldehyde.

Table 3 shows the indoor and outdoor concentrations and I/O ratios of BTEX and carbonyls for each home. Also shown are average concentrations, average I/O ratios, and correlation coefficients between indoor and outdoor concentrations of BTEX and carbonyls. For BTEX concentrations, I/O ratios were mostly greater than 1, except for three homes (homes 6, 10, and 14). The average I/O ratio of the 20 homes for BTEX was 1.44. The average I/O ratios for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes at six homes in Hong Kong were 2.566, 1.617, 0.505 and 1.039, respectively (Guo et al., 2003), while that for BTEX at 352 homes with one-year old children in Valencia, Spain was 2.41 (Esplugues et al., 2010). The correlation between indoor and outdoor BTEX was 0.91 (see Table S3 for the significance of the correlation).

Table 3. 
Indoor and outdoor concentrations, I/O ratios, and correlation coefficients for BTEX and carbonyls.
(in μg/m3) BTEX Carbonyls
Indoor Outdoor I/O ratio Indoor Outdoor I/O ratio
Home 1 56.84 52.60 1.08 52.80 31.13 1.70
2 36.13 33.28 1.09 88.80 21.41 4.15
3 142.47 103.06 1.38 181.90 47.28 3.85
4 191.58 131.47 1.46 177.82 31.91 5.57
5 60.18 47.00 1.28 64.35 25.56 2.52
6 22.73 35.95 0.63 82.87 20.41 4.06
7 106.27 26.69 3.98 123.80 36.90 3.35
8 69.44 54.49 1.27 121.04 27.49 4.40
9 42.52 34.34 1.24 123.04 57.20 2.15
10 10.85 11.28 0.96 67.80 10.97 6.18
11 161.32 109.35 1.48 306.11 43.45 7.04
12 50.89 19.60 2.60 98.71 25.75 3.83
13 12.43 11.46 1.08 93.45 57.61 1.62
14 11.84 12.35 0.96 47.58 32.04 1.48
15 56.43 30.13 1.87 74.75 29.24 2.56
16 82.45 71.52 1.15 75.83 50.03 1.52
17 71.35 48.35 1.48 -* -* -*
18 64.82 27.16 2.39 115.37 42.22 2.73
19 32.40 18.40 1.76 78.42 25.69 3.05
20 32.74 8.62 3.80 101.21 13.18 7.68
Average 61.08 42.49 1.44 106.82 32.75 3.26
I & O correlation coefficient 0.91 0.34
*Carbonyl concentration measurements were eliminated due to sampling error.

Table S3. 
Significance of correlation.
Correlation coefficient Number of dataset p-Value Confidence interval (95%)
Indoor and outdoor BTEX 0.91 20 2.23e-8 0.79~0.96
Indoor and outdoor carbonyls 0.34 19 0.150 -0.13~0.69
Indoor BTEX and indoor carbonyls 0.78 19 0.001 0.51~0.91
Indoor BTEX and indoor NO 0.67 14 0.0092 0.21~0.88
Indoor BTEX and indoor CO2 0.59 19 0.0081 0.18~0.82
Indoor carbonyls and indoor NO 0.50 14 0.071 -0.05~0.81
Indoor carbonyls and indoor CO2 0.61 18 0.0075 0.20~0.84
Indoor BTEX and renovation -0.20 16 0.46 -0.63~0.33
Outdoor BTEX and renovation -0.26 16 0.34 -0.67~0.27
I/O ratio of BTEX and renovation 0.21 16 0.44 -0.32~0.64
Indoor carbonyls and renovation 0.00 15 0.99 -0.51~0.51
Outdoor carbonyls and renovation -0.52 15 0.045 -0.82~-0.02
I/O ratio of carbonyls and renovation 0.64 15 0.010 0.19~0.87
Indoor toluene and indoor benzene 0.49 20 0.030 0.06~0.76
outdoor toluene and outdoor benzene 0.39 20 0.089 -0.06~0.71
Indoor formaldehyde and indoor acetaldehyde 0.52 19 0.022 0.09~0.79
outdoor formaldehyde and outdoor acetaldehyde 0.92 19 0.0000 0.80~0.97

In all homes sampled for carbonyl concentrations, all I/O ratios were higher than 1.The average I/O ratio for all 19 homes was 3.26, which was higher than that for the BTEX samples. The highest I/O ratio, 7.68, was observed at home 20, probably due to renovations and the purchase of new furniture and consumer products within the last two years. The correlation coefficient between indoor and outdoor carbonyls was 0.34, which was smaller than that for BTEX (see Table S3 for the significance of the correlation).

In general, an I/O ratio greater than 1 indicates the existence of indoor sources of compounds. On the other hand, a correlation coefficient close to 1 indicates that indoor pollutants are mainly infiltrating from outdoors, while a correlation coefficient close to 0 implies primarily indoor sources of contaminants. In this study, an I/O ratio of 1.44 and a high correlation coefficient of 0.91 for BTEX indicate that both indoor sources and infiltration of outdoor air have affected indoor pollutant levels. However, for carbonyls, a high I/O ratio of 3.26 and low correlation coefficient of 0.34 indicate that indoor sources were the primary contributor to indoor levels. Possible indoor pollutant sources of BTEX and carbonyls include interior materials, new furniture and consumer products, cooking style, type of stove, cigarette smoking, frequency of dry cleaning, and printer usage, whereas possible outdoor sources of BTEX include traffic emissions.

3. 2 Correlation of BTEX and Carbonyl Concentrations with NO and CO2 Concentrations

To determine whether a correlation existed between BTEX or carbonyl levels and other indoor pollutants, NO and CO2 concentrations were measured. NO measurements were conducted at 14 of the 20 homes, and CO2 measurements at 19 of them. Fig. 1 shows the average indoor NO and BTEX concentrations at each home, indicating that BTEX concentration increased with an increase in NO concentration. The correlation coefficient was 0.67, as shown in Table 4. This high degree of correlation is probably due to both nitrogen oxides and BTEX having been identified as indicators of traffic emissions in previous studies (Yamada et al., 2011; Zalel et al., 2008; Vardoulakis et al., 2002). Fig. 2 shows average indoor CO2 and BTEX concentrations. This correlation was weaker than that of the NO and BTEX concentrations, as shown in Table 4.

Table 4. 
Correlation coefficients of BTEX and carbonyls with NO and CO2.
BTEX Carbonyls
BTEX 1.00 0.78
Carbonyls 0.78 1.00
NO 0.67 0.50
CO2 0.59 0.61


Fig. 1. 
Average indoor NO and BTEX concentrations at each home.


Fig. 2. 
Average CO2 and BTEX concentrations at each home.

The average indoor concentrations of NO and carbonyls at each home are shown in Fig. 3, and Fig. 4 shows the average indoor CO2 concentrations and levels of carbonyls. Unlike the BTEX concentrations, levels of carbonyls were more highly correlated with the concentrations of CO2 than those of NO. The correlation coefficient for carbonyl compounds with CO2 was 0.61, which was higher than the 0.50 correlation coefficient with NO (see Table 4). The significances of the correlations were summarized in Table S3. Since the CO2 concentration can serve as an indicator of the ventilation, the high correlation between CO2 and carbonyl concentrations could indicate that the indoor carbonyl concentration was primarily determined by indoor sources, and reduced with more ventilation.


Fig. 3. 
Average NO and carbonyl concentrations at each home.


Fig. 4. 
Average CO2 and carbonyl concentrations at each home.

3. 3 Correlation of BTEX and Carbonyl Concentrations with House Renovations

Adhesives and paints used for house renovations are known to be strong sources of indoor VOCs (Chen et al., 2014; Maisey et al., 2013; Horemans et al., 2008; Brown, 2002). This study calculated the correlation between house renovations (scored as 1 for renovations within the past two years and 0 for no renovations) and both the concentrations and I/O ratios of BTEX and carbonyls. As seen in Table 5, the I/O ratio of carbonyls showed the strongest correlation with recent renovations. The indoor BTEX concentration was relatively less correlated with renovations, since it was not solely determined by indoor sources, but largely by the outdoor air. Note that the correlation coefficient between outdoor carbonyl concentration and recent house renovations was - 0.52. This is because the renovated homes were accidentally sampled on days with lower outdoor carbonyl concentrations than those on the non-renovated home sampling days. The significances of the correlations were summarized in Table S3.

Table 5. 
Correlations between recent house renovations and I/O ratios of BTEX and carbonyls.
BTEX Carbonyls
Indoor Outdoor I/O ratio Indoor Outdoor I/O ratio
Correlation coefficient w/renovation -0.20 -0.26 0.21 0.00 -0.52 0.64

However, no significant correlation was found with other possible indoor sources, such as recent furniture purchase, cigarette smoke, or frequencies of dry cleaning and printer usage. This is possibly because the amount of BTEX and carbonyls emitted from those sources are not high enough to determine the overall indoor concentrations of BTEX and carbonyls. On the other hand, a larger number of interior materials were replaced during house renovations, thereby appreciably increasing the indoor levels of BTEX and carbonyls.

3. 4 Toluene-to-Benzene and Formaldehydeto-Acetaldehyde Ratios

The toluene-to-benzene ratios for indoors and outdoors were 19.73 and 14.98, respectively (see Table 6). The values obtained in this study were larger than most of those seen in the literature (Buczynska et al., 2009; Horemans et al., 2008; Kerbachi et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2005; Barletta et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2002; Vardoulakis et al., 2002; Edwards et al., 2001; Hansen and Palmgren, 1996), though one previous study found a ratio of 37, and suggested that this was due to multiple sources of toluene (Ho et al., 2004). Based on the toluene-tobenzene ratio of this study, it is likely that there were multiple sources of BTEX at the sampled homes. This is also confirmed by the correlation coefficients of 0.49 and 0.39, for indoors and outdoors respectively (see Table 6), and the scatter plots in Fig. 5.

Table 6. 
Ratios and correlation coefficients of toluene/benzene and formaldehyde/acetaldehyde.
Toluene-to-benzene Formaldehyde-to-acetaldehyde
Indoor Outdoor Indoor Outdoor
Average 19.73 14.98 2.60 1.50
Std. dev. 17.40 10.64 0.90 0.44
Correlation coefficient 0.49 0.39 0.52 0.92

Table 7. 
Source apportionment of indoor and outdoor BTEX using PMF.
Indoor BTEX Outdoor BTEX
Factor1 Factor2 Factor1 Factor2
Benzene 2.44 0.05 2.40 0.01
Toluene 24.02 4.96 12.70 13.97
Ethylbenzene 2.02 4.49 0.31 3.80
Xylenes 1.75 7.23 1.02 3.85
T/B ratio 9.84 99.2 5.29 1397


Fig. 5. 
Scatter plots of (a) indoor and (b) outdoor toluene vs. benzene concentrations.

The formaldehyde-to-acetaldehyde ratios for indoors and outdoors were 2.60 and 1.50, respectively, which are closer to the values found in the literature (Kume et al., 2008; Moussa et al., 2006; Pang and Mu, 2006; Bakeas et al., 2003; Sin et al., 2001; Christensen et al., 2000; Viskari et al., 2000). In addition, the correlation coefficients between formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were 0.52 and 0.92 for indoors and outdoors, respectively (see Fig. 6 for scatter plots). Our results suggest that carbonyl pollutants arose from a smaller number of sources than did BTEX compounds. The significances of the correlations were summarized in Table S3.


Fig. 6. 
Scatter plots of (a) indoor and (b) outdoor formaldehyde vs. acetaldehyde concentrations.

3. 5 Factor Analysis of Indoor and Outdoor BTEX Using Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF)

Positive matrix factorization (PMF) was performed separately on the indoor and outdoor BTEX concentrations, using EPA PMF 5.0. The two factors, extracted for indoor and outdoor concentrations respectively, are shown in Table 7 along with the calculated toluene-tobenzene ratio (T/B ratio). The PMF result indicates that the concentration profile of BTEX can be explained using two factors, one with a smaller T/B ratio than the average in Table 6 (Factor1), and the other with a very large T/B ratio due to negligible benzene (Factor2). Among previous studies which have reported T/B ratios of traffic related emissions, Ho et al. (2004) found an average T/B ratio of 5.2, measured inside a tunnel in Hong Kong. This is similar to the Factor1 T/B ratio from outdoor BTEX, which is 5.29. The higher T/B ratios of other factors are likely to be influenced by various indoor BTEX sources, such as paints and housing materials. The Factor1 from outdoor BTEX may also be influenced by indoor sources, since it was measured at the balconies of high-rise apartments and the front yards of low-rise buildings.

3. 6 Limitations of This Study

In this study, we measured the concentrations of indoor and outdoor BTEX and carbonyls at 20 homes in Seoul, South Korea from September of 2013 to December of 2014. Since the measurement at each home was conducted at a different day, it is not possible to separately examine the temporal and spatial variations of the concentrations. In Section 3.3, we analyzed the correlation of BTEX and carbonyl concentrations with activities such as house renovations, the purchase of new furniture, cigarette smoking, dry cleaning, and printing. The information regarding the indoor activity is obtained from a questionnaire distributed to the residents. Therefore, the accuracy of the information may vary from resident to resident, which may result in underestimation of the correlation.


4. CONCLUSIONS

In this paper, indoor and outdoor concentrations of BTEX and carbonyl compounds were measured at 20 homes in Seoul, South Korea. (Carbonyl measurement at one home was eliminated due to sampling error.) The study investigated the characteristics of these compounds by calculating the I/O ratios, toluene-to-benzene ratios for BTEX, and formaldehyde-to-acetaldehyde ratios for carbonyls; and correlation coefficients of indoor with outdoor concentrations, and of BTEX and carbonyl compounds with the indoor air pollutants NO and CO2. The following are the major findings of this work:

  • • At the homes sampled, the average I/O ratio for BTEX was 1.44, while that for carbonyls was 3.26. The correlation between indoor and outdoor BTEX concentrations was much stronger than between indoor and outdoor carbonyl concentrations (0.91 for BTEX and 0.34 for carbonyls). These results indicate that indoor sources predominantly determined the indoor carbonyl level, whereas both indoor and outdoor sources significantly affected the indoor BTEX level.
  • • Indoor NO concentrations were highly correlated with levels of BTEX, probably due to both contaminants having originated from traffic emissions.
  • • Carbonyl concentrations were highly correlated with indoor levels of CO2, because both carbonyl and CO2 originate primarily from indoor sources, and both are easily reduced with increased ventilation.
  • • A history of interior renovations within the last two years produced the strongest correlation with the I/O ratio of carbonyls.
  • • The correlation of toluene level with benzene level was lower than that of formaldehyde with acetaldehyde, indicating that there were multiple sources of BTEX and fewer sources of carbonyls at the sampled homes.
  • • The result of the factor analysis, based on positive matrix factorization, indicated that there are multiple sources of toluene emissions, resulting in higher T/B ratios than those found in previous studies.

This study is important in that it is the first to measure and analyze diverse characteristics of BTEX and carbonyls at homes in Seoul, South Korea. Findings from this study can serve as a guide for further studies to identify the pollution sources. The information on the characteristics and sources of pollutants can be used in implementing plans to reduce and regulate these compounds.


Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as part of the ANGEL study, which is supported by the Environmental Health Action Program of the Korea Ministry of Environment (Project No. 2013001360004). The authors also thank Kangmo Ahn, M.D., Ph.D.; Youngshin Han, Ph.D.; and Youngmin Kim, Ph.D. from the Environmental Health Center for Atopic Diseases, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, for recruiting the sampling homes.


REFERENCES
1. Báez, A., Padilla, H., García, R., Torres, M., Rosas, I., Belmont, R., (2003), Carbonyl levels in indoor and outdoor air in Mexico City and Xalapa, Mexico, Science of the Total Environment, 302, p211-226.
2. Bakeas, E.B., Argyris, D.I., Siskos, P.A., (2003), Carbonyl compounds in urban environment of Athens, Greece, Chemosphere, 52, p805-813.
3. Barletta, B., Meinardi, S., Simpson, I.J., Khwajab, H.A., Blakea, D.R., Rowland, F.S., (2002), Mixing ratios of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere of Karachi, Pakistan, Atmospheric Environment, 36, p3429-3443.
4. Bentayeb, M., Billionnet, C., Baiz, N., Derbez, M., Kirchner, S., Annesi-Maesano, I., (2013), Higher prevalence of breathlessness in elderly exposed to indoor aldehydes and VOCs in a representative sample of French Dwellings, Respiratory Medicine, 107, p1598-1607.
5. Brown, S.K., (2002), Volatile organic pollutants in New and Established buildings in Melbourne, Australia, Indoor Air, 12, p55-63.
6. Bruno, P., Caselli, M., De Gennaro, G., Iacobellis, S., Tutino, M., (2008), Monitoring of volatile organic compounds in non-residential indoor environments, Indoor Air, 18, p250-256.
7. Buczynska, A.J., Krata, A., Stranger, M., Godoi, A.F.L., Kontozova-Deutsch, V., Bencs, L., Naveau, I., Roekens, E., Grieken, R.V., (2009), Atmospheric BTEX-concentrations in an area with intensive street traffic, Atmospheric Environment, 43, p311-318.
8. Chen, W., Persily, A.K., Hodgson, A.T., Offermannd, F.J., Poppendieck, D., Kumagai, K., (2014), Area-specific airflow rates for evaluating the impacts of VOC emissions in U.S. single-family homes, Building and Environment, 71, p204-211.
9. Christensen, C.S., Skov, H., Nielsen, T., Lohse, C., (2000), Temporal variation of carbonyl compound concentrations at a semi-rural site in Denmark, Atmospheric Environment, 34, p287-296.
10. Edwards, R.D., Jurvelin, J., Saarela, K., Jantunen, M., (2001), VOC concentrations measured in personal samples and residential indoor, outdoor and workplace microenvironments in EXPOLIS-Helsinki, Finland, Atmospheric Environment, 35, p4531-4543.
11. EPA, (1989), Report to Congress on Indoor Air Quality, Volume II: Assessment and Control of Indoor Air Pollution, Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
12. Esplugues, A., Ballester, F., Estarlich, M., Llops, S., Fuentes-Leonarte, V., Mantilla, E., Iñiguez, C., (2010), Indoor and outdoor air concentrations of BTEX and determinants in a cohort of one-year old children in Valencia, Spain, Science of the Total Environment, 409, p63-69.
13. Guo, H., Lee, S.C., Li, W.M., Cao, J.J., (2003), Source characterization of BTEX in indoor microenvironments in Hong Kong, Atmospheric Environment, 37, p73-82.
14. Hansen, A., Palmgren, F., (1996), VOC air pollutants in Copenhagen, Science of the Total Environment, 189/190, p451-457.
15. Ho, K.F., Lee, S.C., Tsai, W.Y., (2004), Seasonal and diurnal variations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere of Hong Kong, Science of the Total Environment, 322, p155-166.
16. Horemans, B., Worobiec, A., Buczynska, A., Van Meel, K., Van, Grieken, R., (2008), Airborne particulate matter and BTEX in office environments, Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 10, p867-876.
17. IARC, (2004), IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO, Lyon, France.
18. Ilgen, E., Karfich, N., Levsen, K., Angerer, J., Schneider, P., Heinrich, J., Wichmann, H.-E., Dunemann, L., Begerow, J., (2001), Aromatic hydrocarbons in the atmospheric environment: Part 1. Indoor versus outdoor sources, influence of traffic, Atmospheric Environment, 35, p1235-1252.
19. Jia, C., Batterman, S., Godwin, C., (2008), VOCs in industrial, urban and suburban neighborhoods, Part 1: Indoor and outdoor concentrations, variation, and risk drivers, Atmospheric Environment 42, p2083-2100.
20. Kerbachi, R., Boughedaoui, M., Bounoua, L., Keddam, M., (2006), Ambient air pollution by aromatic hydrocarbons in Algiers, Atmospheric Environment, 40, p3995-4003.
21. Kim, J., Kim, S., Lee, K., Yoon, D., Lee, J., Ju, D., (2013), Indoor aldehydes concentration and emission rate of formaldehyde in libraies and private reading rooms, Atmospheric Envroment, 71, p1-6.
22. Kume, K., Ohura, T., Amagai, T., Fusaya, M., (2008), Field monitoring of volatile organic compounds using passive air samplers in an industrial city in Japan, Environmental Pollution, 153, p649-657.
23. Lee, S.C., Chiu, M.Y., Ho, K.F., Zou, S.C., Wang, X., (2002), Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in urban atmosphere of Hong Kong, Chemosphere, 48, p375-382.
24. Liu, Q., Liu, Y., Zhang, M., (2013), Personal exposure and source characteristics of carbonyl compounds and BTEXs within homes in Beijing, China, Building and Environment, 61, p210-216.
25. Maisey, S.J., Saunders, S.M., West, N., Franklin, P.J., (2013), An extended baseline examination of indoor VOCs in a city of low ambient pollution: Perth, Western Australia, Atmospheric Environment, 81, p546-553.
26. Marchand, C., Bulliot, B., Le Calvé, S., Mirabel, Ph., (2006), Aldehyde measurements in indoor environments in Strasbourg (France), Atmospheric Environment, 40, p1336-1345.
27. Ministry of the Environment (MOE), Government of South Korea, Metropolitan atmosphere EPA, Air quality standards in Korea, https://www.me.go.kr/mamo/web/index.do?menuId=586 (accessed on 01/01/2017).
28. Ministry of the Environment (MOE), Government of Japan, Environmental quality standards in Japan, https://www.env.go.jp/en/air/aq/aq.html (accessed on 01/01/2017).
29. Moussa, S.G., Fadel, M.E., Saliba, N.A., (2006), Seasonal, diurnal and nocturnal behaviors of lower carbonyl compounds in the urban environment of Beirut, Lebanon, Atmospheric Environment, 40, p2459-2468.
30. Pang, X., Mu, Y., (2006), Seasonal and diurnal variations of carbonyl compounds in Beijing ambient air, Atmospheric Environment, 40, p6313-6320.
31. Parra, M.A., Elustondo, D., Bermejo, R., Santamariz, J.M., (2008), Quantification of indoor and outdoor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in pubs and cafe̓s in Pamplona, Spain, Atmospheric Environment, 42, p6647-6654.
32. Sakai, K., Norback, D., Mi, Y., Shibata, E., Kamijima, M., Yamada, T., Takeuchi, Y., (2004), A comparison of indoor air pollutants in Japan and Sweden: formaldehyde, nitrogen dioxide, and chlorinated volatile organic compounds, Environmental Research, 94, p75-85.
33. Schlink, U., Thiem, A., Kohajda, T., Richter, M., Strebel, K., (2010), Quantile regression of indoor air concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOC), Science of the Total Environment, 408, p3840-3851.
34. Sin, D.M.W., Wong, T.C., Louie, P.K.K., (2001), Trends of ambient carbonyl compounds in the urban environment of Hong Kong, Atmospheric Environment, 35, p5961-5969.
35. Skov, H., Hansen, A.B., Lorenzen, G., Andersen, H.V., Løfstrøm, P., Christensen, C.S., (2001), Benzene exposure and the effect of traffic pollution in Copenhagen, Denmark, Atmospheric Environment, 35, p2463-2471.
36. Vardoulakis, S., Gonzalez-Flesca, N., Fisher, B.E.A., (2002), Assessment of traffic-related air pollution in two street canyons in Paris: implications for exposure studies, Atmospheric Environment, 36, p1025-1039.
37. Viskari, E.L., Variainen, M., Pasanen, P., (2000), Seasonal and diurnal variation in formaldehyde and acetaldehyde concentrations along a highway in Eastern Finland, Atmospheric Environment, 34, p917-923.
38. WHO, (2000), Air Quality Guidelines for Europe. In: WHO Regional Publications, European Series, second ed, 91, World Health Organization, Copenhagen, Denmark.
39. Yamada, H., Misawa, K., Suzuki, D., Tanaka, K., Matsumoto, J., Fujii, M., Tanaka, K., (2011), Detailed analysis of diesel vehicle exhaust emissions: Nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons and particulate size distributions, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 33, p2895-2902.
40. Zalel, A., Yuval, Broday, D.M., (2008), Revealing source signatures in ambient BTEX concentrations, Environmetal Pollution, 156, p553-562.
41. Zhang, J., He, Q., Lioy, P.J., (1994), Characteristics of aldehydes: concentrations, sources, and exposures for indoor and outdoor residential microenvironments, Environmental Science & Technology, 28, p146-152.
42. Zhu, J., Newhook, R., Marro, L., Chan, C.C., (2005), Selected volatile organic compounds in residential air in the city of Ottawa, Canada, Environmental Science & Technology, 39, p3964-3971.