Asian Journal of atmospheric environment
Asian Journal of atmospheric environment Asian Journal of atmospheric environment
Asian Journal of atmospheric environment

Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment - Vol. 12 , No. 3

[ Research Article ]
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment - Vol. 12, No. 3, pp.193-203
Abbreviation: Asian J. Atmos. Environ
ISSN: 1976-6912 (Print) 2287-1160 (Online)
Print publication date 30 Sep 2018
Received 30 Mar 2018 Revised 13 May 2018 Accepted 15 May 2018

Estimation and Validation of Collection 6 Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer Aerosol Products for East Asia
Kwon-Ho Lee*
Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences (DAES), Gangneung-Wonju National University (GWNU), Gangneung 25457, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to : *Tel: +82-33-640-2319 E-mail:

Copyright ⓒ 2018 by Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Funding Information ▼


The operational aerosol retrieval algorithm for the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) measurements was recently updated and named collection 6 (C6). The C6 MODIS aerosol algorithm, a substantially improved version of the collection 5 (C5) algorithm, uses an enhanced aerosol optical thickness (AOT) retrieval process consisting of new surface reflection and aerosol models. This study reports on the estimation and validation of the two latest versions, the C5 and C6 MODIS aerosol products over the East Asian region covering 20°N to 56°N and 80°E to 150°E. This study also presents a comparative validation of the two versions (C5 and C6) of algorithms with different methods (Dark Target (DT) and Deep Blue (DB) retrieval methods) from the Terra and Aqua platforms to make use of the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) sites for the years 2000-2016. Over the study region, the spatially averaged annual mean AOT retrieved from C6 AOT is about 0.035 (5%) less than the C5 counterparts. The linear correlations between MODIS and AERONET AOT are R = 0.89 (slope = 0.86) for C5 and R = 0.95 (slope = 1.00) for C6. Moreover, the magnitude of the mean error in C6 AOT-the difference between MODIS AOT and AERONET AOT-is 40% less than that in C5 AOT.

Keywords: MODIS, Aerosol retrieval, AOT, Satellite, Sun-sky radiometer


Estimating the distribution, variation, and intensity of atmospheric aerosols has been an important issue in air quality and climate change studies (Myhre et al., 2013). Several studies have been conducted around the world to understand the impact of atmospheric aerosols, but accurate evaluation of their effects is still challenging due to inhomogeneous aerosol loading and spatio-temporal distribution (e.g., Bellouin et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2009; Huebert et al., 2003; Griggs and Noguer, 2002; Haywood et al., 1999). Thus, fully understanding the impact of aerosol particles on local and global environments is required for evaluation of its characteristics.

The atmospheric environment in East Asia has been affected by severe air pollution originating from human activity and natural aerosols such as desert dust, smoke from forest fire, and biomass burning (Li et al., 2007a; Lee et al., 2006; Murayama et al., 2004), as westerly winds frequently transport the severe air pollution from the East Asian continent to far distances. Although ground-based observations or airborne measurements can provide aerosol properties in-situ, experimental maintenance as well as point measurements at a fixed location still exist as limitations. Instead, satellite remote sensing has been used to provide a spatial distribution of aerosol optical properties in several studies (e.g., Herman et al., 1997; Kaufman et al., 1997a; Stowe et al., 1997; Tanré et al., 1997). They found that columnar aerosol properties, such as aerosol optical thickness (AOT or τ), integrated from the vertical profiles of aerosol extinction coefficients, can be estimated based on numerical and physical computation.

Due to the large variability in atmospheric constituents and surface properties, retrieval of aerosols from satellite data in the visible wavelength region is an ill-posed problem. To separate the surface from other atmospheric contributions to the satellite-receiving radiances, most algorithms use the dark surface method, which assumes a ground target with very low reflection (Kaufman et al., 1997b). For example, typical vegetation pixels are dark in the red (wavelength ≈ 0.66 μm) and blue (wavelength ≈ 0.47 μm) wavelengths, and it is reasonable to use the dark (or low reflection) surface pixels for aerosol retrieval. Many studies have used various techniques, developed to retrieve aerosols using different satellite sensors with optimized algorithms, and they were reviewed by King et al. (1999), Lee et al. (2009), and Kokhanovsky and de Leeuw (2009). Well known algorithms for the sensors include the UV-based algorithm for the Total Ozone Mapping Spectroradiometer (TOMS) (Herman et al., 1997), single or dual visible band algorithm for the Advanced Very High-Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) (Stowe et al., 2002), angular measurement algorithm for the Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) (Diner et al., 2008; Kahn et al., 2005), ocean color algorithm for the sea-viewing wide field of view sensor (Sea-WiFS) (Hsu et al., 2004), and multi-spectral algorithm for the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) (Remer et al., 2005; Kaufman et al., 1997a). Among these aerosol products, MODIS aerosol products have been continuously developed with improved validation schemes. In general, MODIS-retrieved AOT retrievals against the global ground-based measurements from the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) (OʹNeill et al., 2005; Dubovik et al., 2002; Dubovik and King, 2000; Holben et al., 1998) showed good agreement (Chu et al., 2002; Ichoku et al., 2002). However, over heavy polluted regions or complex land covered areas, MODIS tends to under-or over-estimate AOT values (i.e., Li et al., 2007b).

The main objectives of this study are to estimate the most recent versions of MODIS aerosol products and to evaluate the discrepancies between satellite products and ground observations. We also investigated the influence factor, which can affect the reliability of aerosol retrieval in the study area. Given the spatio-temporal information of aerosols with an update version of the retrieval algorithm, the understanding and application of satellite-retrieved products will be enhanced. This study is structured as follows. The datasets and methodology employed are explained in section 2. Section 3 compares the two latest versions of the MODIS aerosol products. Section 4 presents comparisons between satellite retrievals and ground measurements. We discuss our results and summarize our findings in Section 5.


The MODIS instrument is a multi-spectral sensor onboard the Terra and Aqua satellites. The Terra and Aqua satellites were launched in December 1999 and May 2002, respectively. The Terra satellite is on a descending orbit flying southward across the equator around 01:30 UTC, while the Aqua satellite is on an ascending orbit flying northward around 04:30 UTC. These observation tracks can observe the same place in the morning and afternoon. MODIS has 36 spectral bands ranging from 0.41 μm to 14 μm at three different spatial resolutions (250 m, 500 m, and 1000 m). Three of the spectral bands (i.e., 0.47 μm, 0.66 μm, and 2.12 μm) are used to retrieve aerosols parameters over land, while the remaining bands are used to retrieve aerosol parameters over ocean and for cloud masking and snow cover masking (Remer et al., 2005; Kaufman et al., 1997a).

Fig. 1. 
Schematic diagram of the data processing with MODIS L2 aerosol products.

The most recent MODIS aerosol retrieval algorithm developed are two distinct products denoted as Collections 5 (C5) AOT (Levy et al., 2007; Remer et al., 2005) and Collections 6 (C6) AOT (Levy et al., 2013). Both aerosol products provide global aerosol data retrieved from Terra and Aqua platforms with an expected uncertainty of ±0.05±0.15τ over land (Tanré et al., 1997) and ±0.03±0.05τ over ocean (Remer et al., 2005). The C6 AOT dataset generated with the upgraded algorithm increased the global accuracy and coverage without major changes to the basic principles of the algorithm (Levy et al., 2013). Global datasets are generally met within the expected accuracy; however, significantly larger errors are found in local areas (Li et al., 2009; Levy et al., 2005; Remer et al., 2005; Chu et al., 2002). Moreover, in regions without ground measurements for the inter-comparisons, those errors are largely unknown.

In this study, we used two different MODIS aerosol data (Terra and Aqua), generated by two different retrieval methods (dark target (DT) and deep blue (DB)), for the estimation of differences between the C5 and C6 aerosol products. Differences in DT and DB methods are following. DT has separate algorithms for land and ocean but DB is limited for a land retrieval only. Two methods have different ways of accounting for the surface reflectance. Because aerosol retrieval from satellite observation must account for the surface reflectance to remove its contribution to satellite receiving signal. DT uses spectral ratios between the 0.47, 0.67 and 2.1 μm channels because SWIR channel has lower atmospheric reflection and highly correlated with visible channel. It has known that DT method works best over dark vegetated area and DB works best over bright land surfaces. Since the DT algorithm has limitations for aerosol retrieval over bright land surfaces, the DB algorithm was developed based on the use of the surface reflectance libraries in two blue channels (i.e., 0.412 μm and 0.47 μm), where the surface reflection remains very low and largely stable even over bright surfaces (Hsu et al., 2006, 2004). This method works best over bright land surfaces but can also retrieve aerosols over most vegetated targets. More parameters used in DT and DB method are listed in Table 2.

The data used are extracted from MODIS Level 2 (code names: MOD04 for Terra and MYD04 for Aqua) daily products observed from March 2000 (Jan 2002 for Aqua) to October 2016. It is noteworthy that C5 DB aerosol products are currently available for 2002-2011 from Aqua and 2000-2007 from Terra, based on known calibration issues. The DB algorithm has an expected error of ±0.05±0.20τ over land (Hsu et al., 2013). Our study region extends from 20°N to 58°N and from 80°E to 150°E, as listed in Table 1. A total of 153,195 C5 datasets and 95,949 C6 datasets were analyzed for the AOT by DT method (hereafter, AOTDT) and by DB method (hereafter, AOTDB), to assess their spatial and temporal (seasonal and year-by-year) variability over the study region.

Table 1. 
Specifications of MODIS level 2 aerosol products used in this study.
Characteristics Collection 5 Collection 6
a)PGE 6.0.42
Version 5.1 6.0
Period (used here) 2000-2016 2002-2016
No. of Files 77,491(Terra) 51,309 (Terra)
67,476 (Aqua) 44,640 (Aqua)
Total size 87.57 GB (Terra) 81.57 GB (Terra)
77.33 GB (Aqua) 78.25 GB (Aqua)
Reference Remer et al. (2005) Levy et al. (2013)
a) PGE: The Program Executable

Table 2. 
Characterized parameters of MODIS aerosol retrieval algorithms by dark target (DT) and deep blue (DB) methods.
Parameters Dark target (DT) Deep blue (DB)
Region Land, ocean Land only
Surface reflectance SWIR to visible reflectance ratios Maps and libraries
Best place over Dark vegetated targets Bright land surfaces
Spatial resolution of band used 500 m/pixels 1 km/pixels
Spatial resolution of product 3 km and 10 km 10 km
Reference Levy et al. (2013) Hsu et al. (2013)

The MODIS L2 aerosol data products and methods for both versions were validated against corresponding ground-based sun-sky radiometer measurements from the AERONET database ( The available AERONET observation sites cover a large part of the East Asian region, with 117 stations within the study area. We used Level 2 cloud-screened and quality-assured data. The overall uncertainty in the AERONET AOT data is known to be ±0.01 for wavelengths greater than 440 nm and ±0.02 for shorter wavelengths (Eck et al., 1999).

As shown in Fig. 2, the data analysis process is composed of three parts. First, a valid pair of C5 and C6 data was found for a given pixel at a satellite’s observation time. Both versions of aerosol products including AOTDT and AOTDB are sampled. Second, C5 and C6 data were directly compared to estimate spatial distributions and statistical correlations. Finally, datasets were compared to ground-based AOT measured by sun-skyradiometer for the evaluation of each product.

Fig. 2. 
Averaged spatial distribution of AOT from different collections and retrieval algorithms for MODIS L2 aerosol products during 2000-2015 (Terra) and 2002-2015 (Aqua). Note that the AOT data from DB algorithm are available over land only.

3. 1 Comparisons between Collection 5 and Collection 6 Aerosol Products

Fig. 2 shows the 17-year (2000-2016) Terra and 15-year (2002-2016) Aqua MODIS mean AOT for different algorithms and collections. Note that lots of missing data points expressed as grey area over land are bright land surface features, such as deserts or urban areas in the C5/C6 DT algorithm. Over the bright land surface, there is no retrieval for AOTDT, but pixels are available in AOTDB. Furthermore, AOTDB products are only available over land. After expanding the region of interest in the C6 DT method, more effective data numbers are currently available than any other products over land. In general, mean AOT values range from 0.1 to 1.0 at 550 nm, exhibiting an increase in the continent. Larger AOT values (AOT up to 1.0 at 550 nm over the populated region and megacities), reflecting a significant aerosol load, are observed mainly in the eastern parts of China originating from nearby great urban and industrial areas. The C6 AOTDT distribution is in agreement with that of C5 AOTDT, reported by previous studies (Levy et al., 2013). However, large disagreement is found in the DB algorithms over the study areas, where the C5 AOTDB values are not consistent with C5 AOTDT areas. C6 AOTDB products cover almost the entire land area and their distributions are reasonable. Again, the C6 DB algorithm expands its coverage to vegetated regions, whereas the C5 DB algorithm is limited to bright surfaces only.

The distributions of the seasonal mean differences of AOT from C6 and C5 (dAOTC6-C5=C6 AOT-C5 AOT) generated by different algorithms (DT and DB) during the entire study period is mapped in Figs. 3 and 4. For the DT algorithm, as shown in Fig. 3, large negative values of dAOTC6-C5 (<-0.25) occur over eastcentral China in spring and summer, but the lowest dAOTC6-C5 values (~±0.01) occur over southern China and the ocean. For the DB algorithm, as shown in Fig. 4, dAOTC6-C5 shows negative differences ranging from - 20% to - 50% over almost half the land surface in the study area. Overall, the C6 AOT retrievals are greater than the C5 retrievals, as seen more clearly in the scatterplots of Figs. 5 and 6. These results are similar to the previous study using the MODIS Collection 4 (C4) and C5 aerosol products (Li et al., 2007b).

Fig. 3. 
Absolute difference between the seasonal mean MODIS AOT of different versions (C6 AOT - C5 AOT) by DT algorithm.

Fig. 4. 
Absolute difference between the seasonal mean MODIS AOT (C6 AOT - C5 AOT) by DB algorithm.

Fig. 5. 
Scatter plots between MODIS C5 and C6 AOT pixels during 2000-2016 for Terra and 2002-2016 for Aqua. Color scale represents frequency at the given AOT range (highest value means 0.001% and 0.01% of total number of pixels for Terra and Aqua, respectively).

Fig. 6. 
Inter-annual variations of linear regression slopes, intercepts, correlation coefficients, and mean biases derived from Terra (red and black) and Aqua (magenta and blue) MODIS for the period 2000-2016 over East Asia.

To facilitate the comparison of four different MODIS aerosol products (C5 AOTDT , C6 AOTDT , C5 AOTDB, and C6 AOTDB), the data were sampled by corresponding geographic latitudes and longitudes. Fig. 5 shows the relationship between C5 and C6 AOT with DT and DB algorithms. Although the C5 and C6 AOT products were not made in the same location for entire study areas, existing collocated pixel data were compared at the same time. In the left column of Fig. 5, these two versions of AOTDT products have slight differences in their magnitude. For AOTDT values greater than 3.0, a greater number of scattered data points means that the two aerosol retrieval results are quite different due to their algorithms. C6 AOTDT values are slight larger than the C5 AOTDT values, as seen more clearly in these scatterplots. This overestimation of C5 from the algorithm is very similar to the results from the former versions, regarding the differences between C5 and C4 studied in Li et al. (2007b). For AOTDB products, as shown in the right column of Fig. 5, AOTDB products have substantial differences that are larger than those in the AOTDT cases. It is noteworthy that the maximum permitted AOTDT is 5.0, and in AOTDB the limit is as low as 3.5 over the globe. Moreover, it was found that the largest C6 AOTDB values were 2.75 for C5 and 2.88 for C6 in these comparisons. About 42.8% of C5 AOTDB samples were larger than those of C6 AOTDB. In general, relatively high correlations were found to have moderate correlation coefficients of ~0.88 and ~0.77 for C5 versus C6 AOTDT and AOTDB retrievals, respectively. The slightly weak correlation coefficient for the AOTDB retrieval is due to the smaller number of data points, different surface reflection scheme, and aerosol assumptions in the look-up tables used (Hsu et al., 2013).

During the yearly observation period, the paired data points of Terra/Aqua MODIS C5 and C6 with AOTDT and AOTDB retrievals have been fitted, and linear regression lines and the corresponding statistical coefficients such as slope, y-intercept, correlation coefficient (R), and bias were obtained. These statistical results are shown in Fig. 6. These results revealed that the variability in AOT values derived from the different version is similar for AOTDT retrievals but large for AOTDB retrievals. It is also noted that the C5 AOTDT derived from the Aqua MODIS sensor followed the pattern most stable and similar to the C6 products during the study period. The results also reveal a rather significant yearly variation in the AOTDT from the Terra MODIS, suggesting that the C6 algorithm reflected the differences in the aerosol’s microphysical properties and surface reflection contributions. Meanwhile, over the entire MODIS observation period, the correlation values tend to be larger for AOTDB, but the biases increased with some fluctuations. It is interesting that year 2003 has the largest correlation coefficient, with a positive bias year with AOTDB for both Terra and Aqua MODIS, and bias values of 0.016 for Terra and 0.021 for Aqua. During the study period, each AOT result from the C6 algorithm has a negative bias value, as discussed earlier. These bias values were - 0.046±0.028 for AOTDB and - 0.024±0.015 for AOTDT in the case of Terra MODIS, and - 0.041± 0.016 for AOTDB and - 0.005±0.016 for AOTDT in the case of Aqua MODIS. The aerosol retrieval products differ because of sensor calibration, processing methods, and retrieval algorithms.

Fig. 7. 
Terra and Aqua C6 MODIS AOT products plotted against collocated AERONET observations. The solid straight lines represent the linear regression fit to the collocating data points and the corresponding regression coefficients of the linear fit are also shown in each panel.

3. 2 Comparisons between MODIS and AERONET AOTs

This section is based on the comparisons of MODIS aerosol products discussed in the former sections and AERONET AOT (hereafter, AOTAN) for evaluation in the study area. In these comparisons, the qualityassured level 2.0 AOTAN data with a known uncertainty of 0.015 (Holben et al., 1998) were used as the ground truth data. AOTAN data were collocated in space and time with Terra/Aqua MODIS AOTDT and AOTDB for C5 and C6 algorithms, following the method used in Ichoku et al. (2002). Using this collocation method, a pair of MODIS AOT and AOTAN data were sampled when the temporal difference between the two data was found to be within±30 min, and the spatial distance was within 25 km. Note that, AOTAN data are not available at 550 nm, so AERONET data from the 0.50 and 0.67 μm spectral channels were interpolated to derive AOT values at the 0.55 μm channel, following O’Neill et al. (2003).

The collocated AOT values obtained from the MODIS were validated against the AOTAN over the study area. In Fig. 5, all MODIS AOT products agree generally well with AOTAN within uncertainty levels for each retrieval algorithm. The slopes and intercepts of linear regression lines obtained from the validation is of vital importance. In the case of Terra and Aqua MODIS, the respective correlation coefficients were observed to be 0.88-0.91 with intercepts of 0.005-0.055. Meanwhile, the slopes of 0.799-0.839 deviate from the ideal state, which indicates that MODIS AOTs are systematically overestimated by 31-40%.

In the following, we will now estimate how the retrieved MODIS AOT from the difference algorithms change with the truth AOT. The difference in MODIS AOT retrievals is an essential parameter in estimating the reliable quality of the retrieved AOT products. The relationship between this difference in MODIS AOT retrievals and the AOTAN is illustrated in Fig. 8. One can see that the MODIS C6-C5 difference increases with AOTAN. Consequently, the variation in the MODIS C6-C5 difference with AOTAN suggests that there are issues with the assumed scattering properties of the aerosol types in MODIS aerosol retrieval algorithms.

Fig. 8. 
Scatter plots of MODIS (C6 AOT - C5 AOT) versus AERONET AOT.


The first MODIS observations for atmospheric aerosols were made in early 2000. These MODIS observations provide continuous global coverage and has helped improve retrieval of aerosol products. Such observations are required for satellite data interpretation. Recently, the MODIS aerosol retrieval algorithm was modified and revised, denoted as C6, and a new version of aerosol product was generated to replace the former C5 product. Using MODIS level 2 aerosol product from the most available C5 and C6 from the Terra and Aqua MODIS dataset, we estimated the spatio-temporal variations of the AOT over East Asia during the period from 2000 to 2016. Because the study area is one of the important aerosol sources such as desert dust, urban/industrial emissions, and biomass burning, qualified and quantified aerosol remote sensing data are helpful in understanding their distributions and intensities.

Generally, higher AOT values were observed offshore in east-central China with the maximum values being over the study area. The results confirm that previous MODIS C5 AOT distributions have less spatial coverage, and they exhibit large differences with the current C6 AOT. Two versions of the AOTDT products have slight differences. For MODIS AOTDB, these differences were demonstrated in the regression analysis through smaller slopes and intercepts, and lower correlation coefficients. Although the DB algorithm expands its coverage from the limited bright surface in C5 to vegetated regions in C6, the C5-C6 differences range from - 20% to -50% over almost half of land surface in the study area. The moderate correlations were found to be correlation coefficients of 0.876 and 0.76 for C5 versus C6 AOTDT and AOTDB retrievals, respectively. These results are due to a fewer number of data points, different surface reflection scheme, and aerosol optical properties used in the LUT.

Comparisons between the MODIS AOT products with AOTAN confirm that the error ranges of MODIS aerosol products were within the uncertainty levels for each retrieval algorithm. Linear regression analysis showed that the respective correlation coefficients were observed to be 0.88 - 0.91, with intercepts of 0.005 - 0.055. Meanwhile, the slopes of 0.799 - 0.839 deviate from the ideal state, which indicates that MODIS AOTs are systematically overestimated by 31 - 40%. Also, the difference in MODIS AOT retrievals from the two versions increase with ground truth AOT. Consequently, these estimation and validation results with C5 and C5 retrieval products suggest that there are issues with the assumed scattering properties of the aerosol types in MODIS aerosol retrieval algorithms.


This work was supported by the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program under Grant KMIPA2015-2012. The MODIS L2 aerosol products were acquired from the Level-1 and Atmosphere Archive & Distribution System (LAADS) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC), located in the Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland ( We acknowledge and appreciate the AERONET program and their contributing principal investigators and staff for establishing and maintaining the sites used in this investigation.

1. Bellouin, N., Quaas, J., Morcrette, J.-J., Boucher, O., (2013), Estimates of aerosol radiative forcing from the MACC reanalysis, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13, p2045-2062.
2. Chu, D.A., Kaufman, Y.J., Ichoku, C., Remer, L.A., Tanré, D., Holben, B.N., (2002), Validation of MODIS aerosol optical depth retrieval overland, Geophysical Research Letters, 29.
3. Diner, D.J., Abdou, W.A., Ackerman, T.P., Crean, K., Gordon, H.R., Kahn, R.A., Martonchik, J.V., McMuldroch, S., Paradise, S.R., Pinty, B., Verstraete, M.M., Wang, M., West, R.A., (2008), MISR level 2 aerosol retrieval algorithm theoretical basis, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA, JPL-D 11400, Rev. G.
4. Dubovik, O., King, M.D., (2000), A flexible inversion algorithm for retrieval of aerosol optical properties from Sun and sky radiance measurements, Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, p20673-20696.
5. Dubovik, O., Holben, B.N., Eck, T.F., Smirnov, A., Kaufman, Y.J., King, M.D., Tanré, D., Slutsker, I., (2002), Variability of absorption and optical properties of key aerosol types observed in worldwide locations, Journal of Atmospheric Science, 59, p590-608.
6. Eck, T.F., Holben, B.N., Reid, J.S., Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., O'Neill, N.T., Slutsker, I., Kinne, S., (1999), Wavelength dependence of the optical depth of biomass burning, urban and desert dust aerosols, Journal of Geophysical Research, 104, p31333-31349.
7. Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., (2002), Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Weather, 57, p267-269.
8. Haywood, J., Ramaswamy, V., Soden, B., (1999), Tropospheric aerosol climate forcing in clear-sky satellite observations over the oceans, Science, 283, p1299-1303.
9. Herman, J.R., Bhartia, P.K., Torres, O., Hsu, C., Seftor, C., Celarier, E., (1997), Global distribution of UV-absorbing aerosols from Nimbus 7/TOMS data, Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, p16911-16922.
10. Holben, B.N., Eck, T.F., Slutsker, I., Tanré, D., Buis, J.P., Setzer, A., Vermote, E., Reagan, J.A., Kaufman, Y.J., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F., Jankowiak, I., Smirnov, A., (1998), AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization, Remote Sensing Environment, 66, p1-16.
11. Hsu, C.N., Tsay, S.C., King, M.D., Herman, J.R., (2004), Aerosol properties over bright-reflecting source regions, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42, p557-569.
12. Hsu, C.N., Tsay, S.C., King, M.D., Herman, J.R., (2006), Deep blue inversions of Asian aerosol properties during ACEAsia, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44, p3180-3195.
13. Hsu, N.C., Jeong, M.-J., Bettenhausen, C., Sayer, A.M., Hansell, R., Seftor, C.S., Huang, J., Tsay, S.-C., (2013), Enhanced deep blue aerosol retrieval algorithm: The second generation, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118, p9296-9315.
14. Huebert, B.J., Bates, T., Russell, P.B., Shi, G., Kim, Y.J., Kawamura, K., Carmichael, G., Nakajima, T., (2003), An overview of ACE-Asia: Strategies for quantifying the relationships between Asian aerosols and their climatic impacts, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 108, p1984-2012.
15. Ichoku, C., Chu, D.A., Mattoo, S., Kaufman, Y.J., Remer, L.A., Tanré, D., Slutsker, I., Holben, B.N., (2002), A spatio-temporal approach for global validation and analysis of MODIS aerosol products, Geophysical Research Letters, 29, p1616-1619.
16. Kahn, R.A., Gaitley, B.J., Martonchik, J.V., Diner, D.J., Crean, K.A., Holben, B., (2005), Multiangle Imaging SpectroradiometerMISR) global aerosol optical depth validation based on 2 years of coincident Aerosol Robotic NetworkAERONET) obser vations, Journal of Geophysical Research, 110(D10S04).
17. Kaufman, Y.J., Tanré, D., Remer, L., Vermote, E.F., Chu, A., Holben, B.N., (1997a), Operational remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol over land from EOS moderate resolution imaging spectrometer, Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, p17051-17067.
18. Kaufman, Y.J., Wald, A.E., Remer, L.A., Gao, B.-C., Li, R.-R., Flynn, L., (1997b), The MODIS 2.1-mm channel correlation with visible reflectance for use in remote sensing of aerosol, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35, p1286-1298.
19. King, M.D., Kaufman, Y.J., Tanré, D., Nakajima, T., (1999), Remote sensing of tropospheric aerosols from space: Past, present, and future, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 80, p2229-2259.
20. Kokhanovsky, A.A., de Leeuw, G., (2009), Satellite aerosol remote sensing over land, Springer-Praxis, Berlin, Heidelberg, p379.
21. Lee, K.H., Kim, Y.J., Kim, M.J., (2006), Characteristics of aerosol observed during two severe haze events over Korea in June and October 2004, Atmospheric Environment, 40, p5146-5155.
22. Lee, K.H., Li, Z., Kim, Y.J., Kokhanovsky, A., (2009), Atmospheric aerosol monitoring from satellite observations: A history of three decades, In Atmospheric and Biological Environmental Monitoring, Kim, Y.J., Platt, U., Gu, M.B., and Eds Iwahashi, H., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p13-38.
23. Levy, R.C., Remer, L.A., Martins, J.V., Kaufman, Y.J., PlanaFattori, A., Redemann, J., Wenny, B., (2005), Evaluation of the MODIS aerosol retrievals over ocean and land during CLAMS, Journal of Atmospheric Science, 62, p974-992.
24. Levy, R.C., Remer, L.A., Mattoo, S., Vermote, E.F., Kaufman, Y.J., (2007), A second-generation algorithm for retrieving aerosol properties over land from MODIS spectral reflectance, Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, pD13211.
25. Levy, R.C., Mattoo, S., Munchak, L.A., Remer, L.A., Sayer, A.M., Hsu, N.C., (2013), The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 6, p2989-3034.
26. Li, Z., Chen, H., Cribb, M., Dickerson, R., Holben, B., Li, C., Lu, D., Luo, Y., Maring, H., Shi, G., Tsay, S.-C., Wang, P., Wang, Y., Xia, X., Zheng, Y., Yuan, T., Zhao, F., (2007a), Preface to special section on East Asian Studies of Tropospheric Aerosols: An International Regional ExperimentEASTAIRE), Journal of Geophysical Research, 112(D22S00).
27. Li, Z., Niu, F., Lee, K.-H., Xin, J., Hao, W.-M., Nordgren, B., Wang, Y., Wang, P., (2007b), Validation and understanding of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer aerosol productsC5) using ground-based measurements from the handheld Sun photometer network in China, Journal of Geophysical Research, 112(D22S07).
28. Li, Z., Zhao, X., Kahn, R., Mishchenko, M., Remer, L., Lee, K.H., Wang, M., Laszlo, I., Nakajima, T., Marig, H., (2009), Uncertainties in satellite remote sensing of aerosols and impact on monitoring its long-term trend: a review and perspective, Journal of Annales Geophysicae, 27, p2755-2770.
29. Murayama, T., Müller, D., Wada, K., Shimizu, A., Sekiguchi, M., Tsukamoto, T., (2004), Characterization of Asian dust and Siberian smoke with multi-wavelength Raman LIDAR over Tokyo. Japan in spring. 2003, Geophysical Research Letters, 31(L23103).
30. Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F.-M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.-F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., Robock, A., Stephens, G., Takemura, T., Zhang, H., (2013), Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing, In Climate Change, (2013), Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing, In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Eds Midgley, P.M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
31. O'Neill, N.T., Eck, T.F., Smirnov, A., Holben, B.N., Thulasiraman, S., (2003), Spectral discrimination of coarse and fine mode optical depth, Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(4559).
32. O'Neill, N.T., Thulasiraman, S., Eck, T.F., Reid, J.S., (2005), Robust optical features of fine mode size distributions: Application to the Quebec smoke event of 2002, Journal of Geophysical Research, 110(D11207).
33. Remer, L.A., Kaufman, Y.J., Tanre, D., Mattoo, S., Chu, D.A., Martins, J.V., Li, R.-R., Ichoku, C., Levy, R.C., Kleidman, R .G., Eck, T.F., Vermote, E., Holben, B.N., (2005), The MODIS Aerosol Algorithm, Products and Validation, Journal of Atmospheric Science, 62, p947-973.
34. Stowe, L.L, Ignatov, A.M., Singh, R.R., (1997), Second generation operational aerosol product at NOAA/NESDIS, Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, p16923-16934.
35. Stowe, L.L., Jacobowitz, H., Ohring, G., Knapp, K., Nalli, N., (2002), The Advanced Very High Resolution Pathfinder AtmospherePATMOS) climate dataset: Initial analysis and evaluations, Journal of Climate, 15, p1243-1260.
36. Tanré, D., Kaufman, Y.J., Herman, M., Mattoo, S., (1997), Remote sensing of aerosol properties over oceans using the MODIS/EOS spectral radiances, Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, p16971-16988.
37. Yang, M., Howell, S., Zhuang, J., Huebert, B., (2009), Attribution of aerosol light absorption to black carbon, brown carbon, and dust in China-interpretations of atmospheric measurements during EAST-AIRE, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9, p2035-2050.